Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
1. I would take Patrick over Baker any day, but the Patrick administration could have been tighter.
Sat Oct 3, 2015, 06:18 AM
Oct 2015

Whether it's the Commonwealth of Massachusetts or the City of Boston, I don't really know how many millions we have to keep funneling into attracting tourists.

Massachusetts, and especially Boston, is the birthplace/bakery of the Revolution, and has so much more to offer, including Plymouth Rock/Plimoth Plantation*, Cape Cod and the Berkshires.

Even if we do need to spend a lot to attract tourists, at some point, the law of diminishing returns kicks in.

Also, at what point will what we spend to attract tourists exceed the revenues the state actually gets as a result of tourism?** Has anyone without skin in that game even bothered to try to find out?


*http://www.plimoth.org/?gclid=CLj9rbKVpsgCFQmPHwodmKcFwQ I am the only one in my family who wants to have dinner there on Thanksgiving Day.

**How many tourist dollars actually find their way into the coffers of the state or city.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»Walsh insider was high-ra...»Reply #1