Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

llmart

(16,331 posts)
24. Yes, that is a problem we face also.....
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:41 AM
Mar 2016

There is no easy solution to it either. We have quite a few older professors, even one in his 80's, who for varying reasons will not retire, though the union contract has tried to deal with the issue by offering more incentives for them to retire. I don't want to paint the issue with a broad brushstroke here and have to qualify my comments by first saying that I'm one of those "70'ish women" you speak of, though I'm in faculty administration, not a professor. The main reason we're given for most of the older professors who won't retire is that they have never built a life outside of their career and cannot fathom not getting up and going to work every day. The money is no longer an incentive for them, so telling them that we'll offer them a payout bonus to leave doesn't make any difference. We also have a few who have kept current over all these years and are excellent teachers, but I would say the majority of those who have been there 45+ years are just going through the motions.

Having said that though there are just as many in administration that haven't kept current themselves and I work for one of them. She is actually younger than I am and is able to get by on her b.s. and schmoozing with almost zero technology skills.

I feel the students are getting ripped off in many ways because the money goes into marketing and the top 1% of the organization and not in recruiting new, exciting professors.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You might find it hard to believe, but even unions have unions whathehell Mar 2016 #1
Third paragraph is foolish rpannier Mar 2016 #2
It's just typical broad-brushing of the demonization. MH1 Mar 2016 #3
Isn't the post about the exploitation and lack of job security of the adjuncts rather than . . . brush Mar 2016 #23
Academic life is very stressful... Helen Borg Mar 2016 #4
Often yanked away? rjsquirrel Mar 2016 #5
Yours is a strawman argument... mark67 Mar 2016 #13
You misunderstand rjsquirrel Mar 2016 #14
We both agree on that... mark67 Mar 2016 #18
Which fields need more PhDs? mascarax Mar 2016 #19
I've worked in both academia and the private sector. Alkene Mar 2016 #6
Brilliant! Android3.14 Mar 2016 #8
The basic problem is lack of state funding Android3.14 Mar 2016 #7
An offshoot of declining funding is the impact on enrollment Alkene Mar 2016 #10
Your numbers are half right rjsquirrel Mar 2016 #15
+1000 abelenkpe Mar 2016 #20
What, he just noticed? malthaussen Mar 2016 #9
So true.... llmart Mar 2016 #11
Eh, I have a friend with a PhD in physics. malthaussen Mar 2016 #12
Also people refuse to retire... mark67 Mar 2016 #16
Yeah, you'll get that. malthaussen Mar 2016 #21
Yes, that is a problem we face also..... llmart Mar 2016 #24
We have at least 80-100 applicants for each STEM position.... llmart Mar 2016 #26
Anyone who pays for their own PhD rjsquirrel Mar 2016 #17
While that position has merit... malthaussen Mar 2016 #22
Lol whut? rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #28
Not sure what your comment is supposed to mean.... llmart Mar 2016 #25
Yes I know that rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #29
K&R nt TBF Mar 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»Adjunct professors unioni...»Reply #24