Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Massachusetts

edcantor

(325 posts)

2. The EEOC usually doesn't start investigations without

Reply to Ian David (Original post)

Fri May 25, 2012, 07:51 AM

May 2012

some evidence or without at least a complaint, and a repetitive pattern in employment practices.

Did Dunkin Donuts file the complaint? I doubt even that would get much attention.

Perhaps there are 3 or more male applicants that were never hired, or some applicants of color, or some applicants over 35, or all 3 classes.

I'd like to read the actual allegations and the substance of evidence before reading about what the owner of the firm claims is a witch hunt.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Marylou's hiring practices draw federal scrutiny, owner says its witch hunt [View all] Ian David May 2012 OP

I suspect ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2012 #1

And then there's the whole "define perky" and "define girls" thing as well. MADem Jun 2012 #4

The EEOC usually doesn't start investigations without edcantor May 2012 #2

There's smoke, and there's fire, in this suit. nt MADem Jun 2012 #3