Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DryRain

(237 posts)
7. Yeah, I was half kidding. Cutting down on driving is a better option
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 09:58 AM
Jan 2013

And one which makes more sense, fewer short trips to the store, fewer miles per year. The goal is to reduce dependency upon the automobile for many, but this proposal will hurt people who have no other option, people who are working poor, people who drive for a living, people in rural areas who have to drive 10 miles to the store, etc.

Bottom line: just how many billions a year more does this state need to provide quality services, roads, schools, colleges, etc.? And where is the best place to find that money in taxes and fees? I doubt charging the working poor and elderly on fixed incomes is a good idea.

How about increasing the tax on restaurants, pro sporting events , hotels, airport landing fees, stock trades. Those are mostly paid by people who can afford to pay a little more.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

New taxes for Mass taxpayers? [View all] DryRain Jan 2013 OP
I hope not. TheCowsCameHome Jan 2013 #1
New roads and mass transit, school and colleges need money. Taxes pay for good things graham4anything Jan 2013 #2
Sometimes 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #8
CALIFORNIA'S 0.25% FOUR YEAR TAX INCREASE ROBROX Jan 2013 #21
.41% bunnies Jan 2013 #3
Not Proportionate 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #4
I'm wondering about that, too! As a senior... DryRain Jan 2013 #5
That will not work 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #6
Yeah, I was half kidding. Cutting down on driving is a better option DryRain Jan 2013 #7
Cutting down on driving isn't always an option Blaukraut Jan 2013 #9
Unknown Cost 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #10
Where did you get your figures for 19,000 welfare recipients? DryRain Jan 2013 #11
A funny thing happened on the way to the Election 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #12
You are mixing apples and oranges. We need to know: DryRain Jan 2013 #13
It was not my job 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #15
I hope you consider it your "job" to get the facts right. DryRain Jan 2013 #16
You missed my point 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #17
You had a point? DryRain Jan 2013 #19
? 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #25
Cannot afford mistakes? DryRain Jan 2013 #14
Why do you Infer the Worst in People 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #18
I don't "infer"! I rely upon facts you skillfully avoid DryRain Jan 2013 #20
Never said Such 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #22
So that nineteen thousand figure had to do with that DryRain Jan 2013 #23
That implies Nothing 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #24
It's worth it flyingfysh Jan 2013 #26
Massachusetts is a funny small state with lots of value DryRain Jan 2013 #27
I understand it is income tax up (by a percent) and sales tax down? MADem Jan 2013 #28
Income tax up by .75% but individual deductions doubled. Sales tax down 1% or so Blaukraut Jan 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»New taxes for Mass taxpay...»Reply #7