Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DryRain

(237 posts)
13. You are mixing apples and oranges. We need to know:
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 11:48 AM
Jan 2013

1) what database was used for the mailing? 2) when the mailing "capture" was made...(the date and time of the actual names on the list). 3) How many weeks progressed between the capture to the mailing? 4) Whether the mailing included food stamp, child care, as well as direct welfare cash payment recipients.

If all food stamp and day care and SSI and medicare recipients were included in the listing, we would have a list of over 200,00, again, perhaps parts of which were up to 3 months out of verification. (An error rate of less than 10%, by the way, if over 200,000 were sent cards).

Sending out 19,000 mis-addressed mailings does NOT equate to your first statement, namely that 19,000 people fraudulently get checks from welfare every month for a year. People move, (in and out of state, even), people GET OFF WELFARE and get jobs. People marry, change their names.

I suspect you read this story on Fox25 or the Boston Herald, and a more complete story indicates that the list used was a few months out of date, or that the list was in some other way defective. But I'd appreciate a follow-up story about the detailed auditing of that list which should have been completed by now.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

New taxes for Mass taxpayers? [View all] DryRain Jan 2013 OP
I hope not. TheCowsCameHome Jan 2013 #1
New roads and mass transit, school and colleges need money. Taxes pay for good things graham4anything Jan 2013 #2
Sometimes 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #8
CALIFORNIA'S 0.25% FOUR YEAR TAX INCREASE ROBROX Jan 2013 #21
.41% bunnies Jan 2013 #3
Not Proportionate 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #4
I'm wondering about that, too! As a senior... DryRain Jan 2013 #5
That will not work 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #6
Yeah, I was half kidding. Cutting down on driving is a better option DryRain Jan 2013 #7
Cutting down on driving isn't always an option Blaukraut Jan 2013 #9
Unknown Cost 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #10
Where did you get your figures for 19,000 welfare recipients? DryRain Jan 2013 #11
A funny thing happened on the way to the Election 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #12
You are mixing apples and oranges. We need to know: DryRain Jan 2013 #13
It was not my job 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #15
I hope you consider it your "job" to get the facts right. DryRain Jan 2013 #16
You missed my point 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #17
You had a point? DryRain Jan 2013 #19
? 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #25
Cannot afford mistakes? DryRain Jan 2013 #14
Why do you Infer the Worst in People 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #18
I don't "infer"! I rely upon facts you skillfully avoid DryRain Jan 2013 #20
Never said Such 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #22
So that nineteen thousand figure had to do with that DryRain Jan 2013 #23
That implies Nothing 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #24
It's worth it flyingfysh Jan 2013 #26
Massachusetts is a funny small state with lots of value DryRain Jan 2013 #27
I understand it is income tax up (by a percent) and sales tax down? MADem Jan 2013 #28
Income tax up by .75% but individual deductions doubled. Sales tax down 1% or so Blaukraut Jan 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»New taxes for Mass taxpay...»Reply #13