Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

4Q2u2

(1,406 posts)
17. You missed my point
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:47 PM
Jan 2013

It was not my job to verify the validity of the list that was used by the State. It was my hope that the State would be doing a better job at that. In terms of me doing the mailings, I am not a Billion Dollar Organization with multitudes of people in my work force. If it was my responsibility as Dept head, I would be disappointed with nothing less than 100%, because that means we missed somebody for either the original intent of the voter registration or assets may not be directed to places or people that needed those funds. Funds that even their own Dept. could use for someone on a waiting list, not just the general public.

You already had the news stories in your post, but below here is the first one and the following article, the one were the State looked into the problem and gave their response. i did not include them because you will not believe they are valid because it is a Right Wing publications. You also missed my point that it was a story that one should read and then follow up to gain more information elsewhere. My assertion was that there was 19,000 missing people on the roles from a State run database and there could be a lot of money being wasted. . So before the State asks my already strained budget to break, please do a better job for us. Then when they have their house in better order, come to the PEOPLE and have a dialog about how to fix the problems and not just default to raising taxes. That is intellectually lazy and disingenuous to quote a phrase.

I could have just as easily mentioned the waste at the Probation Office and the Hiring Scandal, the waste in construction costs on the Big Dig and the Non-Profit Rose Kennedy Greenway Association. So in one point you are correct, the example I used was a poor one in as much that people on welfare are vilified by the strong and should not be used as a rock to hit someone over the head with. They should be protected.

"The Department of Transitional Assistance contacted 477,000 welfare recipients who were on their books from June 1, 2011, to May 31, 2012," from the article linked below. Your 70,000 is short based on State own numbers.

The only mistake here is that you assumed that there was some kind of hate on my part for people on welfare. I am a Father of 4 beautiful Children whose mother is sick, making me pretty much a single parent, and me asking my State to do a better job before they put me in bankruptcy is some how hate speech. I cannot afford any new taxes, they will wipe me out. They irony being that I am just above their threshold to qualify for help. Where does it all go, look at the price of gas (one of the things they want to raise taxes on) price of food (mileage tax and gas tax will be passed on to consumers), my mortgage to keep a nice safe roof over my kids head ( I hope the deduction does not get cut by the Feds). So yes I am a little mad that the State is looking to me for more money, I am here fighting for my children.



http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2013/01/welfare_recipients_%E2%80%98missing%E2%80%99
http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_politics/2013/01/gov_vows_review_welfare_clients

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

New taxes for Mass taxpayers? [View all] DryRain Jan 2013 OP
I hope not. TheCowsCameHome Jan 2013 #1
New roads and mass transit, school and colleges need money. Taxes pay for good things graham4anything Jan 2013 #2
Sometimes 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #8
CALIFORNIA'S 0.25% FOUR YEAR TAX INCREASE ROBROX Jan 2013 #21
.41% bunnies Jan 2013 #3
Not Proportionate 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #4
I'm wondering about that, too! As a senior... DryRain Jan 2013 #5
That will not work 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #6
Yeah, I was half kidding. Cutting down on driving is a better option DryRain Jan 2013 #7
Cutting down on driving isn't always an option Blaukraut Jan 2013 #9
Unknown Cost 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #10
Where did you get your figures for 19,000 welfare recipients? DryRain Jan 2013 #11
A funny thing happened on the way to the Election 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #12
You are mixing apples and oranges. We need to know: DryRain Jan 2013 #13
It was not my job 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #15
I hope you consider it your "job" to get the facts right. DryRain Jan 2013 #16
You missed my point 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #17
You had a point? DryRain Jan 2013 #19
? 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #25
Cannot afford mistakes? DryRain Jan 2013 #14
Why do you Infer the Worst in People 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #18
I don't "infer"! I rely upon facts you skillfully avoid DryRain Jan 2013 #20
Never said Such 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #22
So that nineteen thousand figure had to do with that DryRain Jan 2013 #23
That implies Nothing 4Q2u2 Jan 2013 #24
It's worth it flyingfysh Jan 2013 #26
Massachusetts is a funny small state with lots of value DryRain Jan 2013 #27
I understand it is income tax up (by a percent) and sales tax down? MADem Jan 2013 #28
Income tax up by .75% but individual deductions doubled. Sales tax down 1% or so Blaukraut Jan 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»New taxes for Mass taxpay...»Reply #17