Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Minnesota

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)

6. I still think he is wrong. The default should be that journalists (not thrillseekers or

Reply to riversedge (Reply #5)

Sun Apr 18, 2021, 04:55 PM

Apr 2021

wannabees) are allowed. If access is denied, there should be specific reasons.

Journalists know how to cover wars, forest fires, revolutions, volcanoes and dam breaks without getting in the way, so it makes no sense that they can't cover a demonstration. Especially when it's apparent that the greatest danger to them may be the police themselves.

On edit-- anyway, they won, so far.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ellison opposes motion to exempt journalists from arrest during protests [View all] TexasTowelie Apr 2021 OP

The journalists won, got the TRO. Ocelot II Apr 2021 #1

Thanks. TexasTowelie Apr 2021 #4

Wtf ellie Fullduplexxx Apr 2021 #2

I'm not sure where the law is on this, but I believe that journalists are the documentarians... TreasonousBastard Apr 2021 #3

see this: Gov exempted journalists from nightly curfews but not from orders from law enforcement.... riversedge Apr 2021 #5

I still think he is wrong. The default should be that journalists (not thrillseekers or TreasonousBastard Apr 2021 #6

I agree with you. riversedge Apr 2021 #7

I agree with Ellison. He's doing the best in a bad situation. Owl Apr 2021 #8