Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Oregon

fredamae

(4,458 posts)

3. It's a matter of allowing

Reply to eridani (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 13, 2014, 10:01 AM

Dec 2014

the voter what they believe to be an adequate amount of time (in OR it's determined 8 days is adequate) to respond to and correct the confusion re: an individual ballot....they can't just notify a voter of an inconsistency without a timely response requirement or they'd have to still go back to Bush/Gore to recount-as I understand it.
Here is the OR SoS website...

http://sos.oregon.gov/elections/Pages/default.aspx

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Could someone explain why those 4000 votes on the GMO initiative weren't counted? [View all] eridani Dec 2014 OP

You are contacted fredamae Dec 2014 #1

Why the eight day requirement? eridani Dec 2014 #2

It's a matter of allowing fredamae Dec 2014 #3

Thanks for the information, fredamae. classof56 Dec 2014 #4

I think in many counties there are efforts to make sure that this process works... cascadiance Dec 2014 #5

To the best of my knowledge......... fredamae Dec 2014 #7

From my discussions, I think that every effort has been made to make this an honest & decent process cascadiance Dec 2014 #8

It isn't perfect for Every fredamae Dec 2014 #6

I understand that Oregon uses computer progams to match signatures eridani Dec 2014 #9