Vermont

spooky3

(36,635 posts)

4. I have a hard time understanding the rationale for this. When I go to

Thu Apr 2, 2020, 10:03 PM

Apr 2020

Target, for example, I have 20+ items on my list. Some are "essential"; some help us get by without losing all semblance of normal life and mental health. "Beauty supplies", for example, are necessary if I'm to put forward a professional appearance online, which I am required to do, to do my work. Why prevent people from buying these items, and add to their stress, given that this is going to continue for MONTHS? I'm going to be in the store either way and buying more items helps preserve the jobs of those there. How does it keep others or me safer to restrict me from buy some stuff when I am already there to buy other stuff?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Target, Walmart, Costco ordered to stop in-person sales of nonessential items in Vermont [View all] PoliticAverse Apr 2020 OP

Beverages better be in. If they take away my baba, I start making molotov cocktails out of brewens Apr 2020 #1

I oppose this. If you need a new computer keyboard, or your shoes wear out, you need a store. Liberty Belle Apr 2020 #2

good points -- and for us non-toddlers, underwear and other clothing wears out spooky3 Apr 2020 #6

Quite frankly, that makes no sense. If the store is open, PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2020 #3

exactly nt spooky3 Apr 2020 #5

I have a hard time understanding the rationale for this. When I go to spooky3 Apr 2020 #4

Right. PoindexterOglethorpe Apr 2020 #8

we need non essentials to keep entertained at hime AlexSFCA Apr 2020 #7

I wonder if this asshole considers animal food and care Doreen Apr 2020 #9

There should be major push back against this stupid plan. madaboutharry Apr 2020 #10

Interesting that the link is to a fox station in TN. niyad Apr 2020 #11

I agree larwdem Apr 2020 #12