Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Virginia

Warpy

(113,131 posts)

4. I'd have nailed huim with a civil suit over his damned dawgs

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Wed May 11, 2022, 04:26 PM

May 2022

I have to wonder if the Medeiros property was posted. If it was, they likely have grounds for a civil suit if the dawgs had injured or killed any of their chickens.

Otherwise, I'd want an owner to retrieve his pack if they strayed into my yard and I'd want them retrieved immediately.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Private property owners sue over Virginia's hunting dog law [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2022 OP

That's crazy. Laffy Kat May 2022 #1

Wow. Seems like a unconstitutional search and seizure to me, put in a different way. SWBTATTReg May 2022 #2

That is so farking crazy. You can shoot a person for coming onto your land/house, but you can't Ferrets are Cool May 2022 #3

I'd have nailed huim with a civil suit over his damned dawgs Warpy May 2022 #4