Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Washington

rsdsharp

(10,508 posts)

3. Palsgraf v Long Island R. R. "The risk reasonably to be perceived defines the duty to be obeyed."

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Fri Nov 3, 2023, 03:19 PM

Nov 2023

Was it obvious the off duty pilot was impaired? If not, I don’t think this goes anywhere. I think it’s pretty standard for off duty flight crew to ride in the cockpit, if there’s room. Unless his impairment was obvious, I don’t see a breach of duty.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

3 passengers sue Alaska Airlines after off-duty pilot accused of trying to cut engines mid-flight [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2023 OP

Trying to make a buck off incident Demovictory9 Nov 2023 #1

Wasn't there a off duty pilot recently.............................. Lovie777 Nov 2023 #2

I think that's this one. Angleae Nov 2023 #4

Palsgraf v Long Island R. R. "The risk reasonably to be perceived defines the duty to be obeyed." rsdsharp Nov 2023 #3