1066, Hitler, the Corn Laws... Why are Brexiteers the basic bitches of history? [View all]
Why are top Brexiteers references to history always so
basic?
Boris Johnson, writing in his Telegraph column today, referred to 1066 surely the cheapest novelty mug in the giftshop of English history.
If Chequers were adopted it would mean that for the first time since 1066, he writes, our leaders were deliberately acquiescing in foreign rule.
This is, of course, wrong.
-------------
The main problem is the sheer basicness of the reference. Why do these Brexiteers only ever have sub-GCSE historical references to wheel out? Less than three months ago, as another example, Jacob Rees-Mogg was warning Theresa May that reneging on her Brexit promise would lead to the same fate of Conservative prime minister Robert Peel when he repealed the Corn Laws in 1846.
This was also wrong. History absolved Peels decision to put country above party something Rees-Mogg and other Corn Law-warning Brexiteers appear to have overlooked.
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2018/09/1066-hitler-corn-laws-why-are-brexiteers-basic-bitches-history
Facts? We don't need no basic facts - as long as we have revisionism ...