Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Election Reform

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
Sat May 9, 2015, 08:40 AM May 2015

New study refutes Justice Robert's rationale on weakening VRA [View all]

BrennanCenter

In his 2013 decision weakening the VRA, Chief Justice John Roberts said the formula used to determine which jurisdictions needed to gain prior approval before changing voting laws was out of date. But a new study http://www.brennancenter.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u=81504&qid=4861768 from California Institute of Technology Prof. Morgan Kousser casts doubt on Roberts’s claim. Kousser examined http://www.brennancenter.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u=81505&qid=4861768 thousands of voting rights cases from 1957 to 2013 and found 90 percent occurred in previously covered areas. The research shows the VRA “succeeded in accurately homing in on counties where the vast majority of violations would take place,” Koussar said. http://www.brennancenter.org/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u=81652&qid=4861768

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»New study refutes Justice...»Reply #0