Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Election Reform

(30,058 posts)

14. Perhaps in some cases, in cases of a controlling mate it is not this simple, you have to think

Tue Aug 4, 2015, 09:19 AM

Aug 2015

outside of the box. If anyone sees your ballot it is not secret voting anymore.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A possible campaign for verifiable elections? [View all] Stevepol Aug 2015 OP

The danger is much greater of losing privacy in the present set-up Stevepol Aug 2015 #2

No I'm talking about the two main types of voting machines. Stevepol Aug 2015 #4

Why not? I get an ATM receipt. Downwinder Aug 2015 #6

We are entitled to secret ballot of which I value. Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #7

A printout would not make it any more or less secret. Downwinder Aug 2015 #8

Only if you permit it. Downwinder Aug 2015 #13

But the voter could be improperly pressured to permit it. Jim Lane Aug 2015 #17

Why ATMs are nothing at all like voting machines eridani Aug 2015 #9

A wonderful summary of the situation but Stevepol Aug 2015 #10

I absolutely agree that this would help turn up skullduggery eridani Aug 2015 #11

This is what the group would be for: Stevepol Aug 2015 #15

By the way, Stevepol Aug 2015 #16