Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Land Shark

(6,348 posts)
2. Just fyi non-citizens could vote during many years of our history
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 11:22 PM
Feb 2016

For the most part, this was frontier states which promised the right to vote for all males, citizens or not, and sometimes females, as a way to attract settlers and economic development.

Also, in some municipalities today, non-citizens do vote.

It makes a significant amount of sense because the "consent of the governed" doesn't seem to be limited to citizens and jndeed, in many ways, non-citizens (and felons) are HIGHLY governed and thus the case for rights of representation is arguably stronger than with regular citizens.

I do understand that citizenship entails duties and responsibilities and voting can be seen as a tradeoff for those duties. I'm not looking for a debate on this, just want to make a point of information that it hasn't been obvious to past states that only citizens should vote, and not obvious to every municipality in our country today, some of whom do have legal noncitizen voting.

Nor does everyone have to register to vote ahead of.time or at the polls. North Dakota has no voter registration requirement today. (They have some ID required however)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»CLEARLY NON-CITIZENS SHOU...»Reply #2