Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SaveTheMackerel

(37 posts)
1. I have another solution:
Fri Feb 19, 2016, 11:49 PM
Feb 2016

4 candidates go on the general ballot.
Every voter can vote 1 vote for any of them.
The top 2 go to the second round of the general ballot.
Minimal or no vote splitting.

How do we get 4?
One way is the 4 that get the most signatures, or the 4 that pay the highest fees. I prefer the 4 who get the most people to donate $5 each.
This way, anyone can run, unless the race is already very competitive. There should be no minimum number.

Since there are 2 general races, we drop the public primaries to save time and money. Instead, we let parties and independent voters hold their own private convention.
Then, we don't let parties just put someone on the ballot. All candidates must compete to be in the 4 that get the most signatures or most $5 donors, whatever the standard is.
If someone can't get into the top 4 on their own, they drop out and team up with a similar candidate.

I have other simple fraud prevention if you are worried about that. How do you like the basic idea?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have another solution: SaveTheMackerel Feb 2016 #1
how do we get the Democratic Party to agree... eniwetok Mar 2016 #2
I don't support ranked choice. LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #3
approval voting . . . clarkkentvotes Sep 2016 #4
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Election Reform»The problem with ranked c...»Reply #1