Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(161,212 posts)
14. Which would never work in the real world
Wed Sep 28, 2022, 03:11 PM
Sep 2022

I am sad that you want to eliminate the jobs of Sheila Jackson Lee, Al Green, Sylvia Garcia and other minorities who are holding offices in order to adopt a rather silly plan that would not work in the real world. These minority candidates would stand no chance of being elected in a statewide race which is why minority majority congressional districts are so important in the real world. Luckily no one would take your plan to be a serious plan in the real world and there is no chance that it could or would be adopted. As a former debater, I was amused to look at your amusing plan and it was clear to me that this plan made no sense.

Again, in Texas county and municipal elections are non-partisan but that does not stop the parties from backing their preferred candidate. The current mayor of Houston is a former Democratic state representative who ran against a candidate endorsed by TFG in the last mayor's race. A number of democrats are lining up to replace Mayor Turner including a Democratic state Senator, a Democratic state representative and other democrats on the city council. There is one former biglaw partner who is running that may fit your criterion, but I doubt that he has a chance. I know about these candidates because I am on their contribution lists (you do not want to see my email box). Your plan simply would not work in the real world and would really hurt groups

Have fun but I will be working on turning Texas blue and fighting GOP voter suppression laws.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm afraid that these days unaffiliated means republican Walleye Sep 2022 #1
For unaffilieated we need to develop how the candidates are picked Huin Sep 2022 #4
How would requiring 1/3rd of the House reps per state be "free agents" encourage compromise FreepFryer Sep 2022 #2
These candidates when elected have a mandate to those who elected them Huin Sep 2022 #5
so a survey company will set the political agenda ? FreepFryer Sep 2022 #8
Destroying the two party system is not a way to fix anything LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #3
Who is talking about destroying a two-party system? Huin Sep 2022 #6
Are you kidding? The premise of your plan is to destroy the two party system LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #7
I need to disagree. I do not want to destroy but strengthen our two party system. Huin Sep 2022 #12
I am amused that you do not understand the concepts LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #15
BTW, your silly plan would kill the Congressional Black Caucus LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #9
The "Why" of this should be explained Huin Sep 2022 #10
Your plan would eliminate minority majority congressional districts LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #11
But not the ability to run for the same seat without affiliation. Huin Sep 2022 #13
Which would never work in the real world LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #14
So we part and go our ways Huin Sep 2022 #16
You have clearly not interacted with many lawyers. LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #17
Thank you for your reply Huin Oct 2022 #18
Your hatred of political parties doomed your concept LetMyPeopleVote Oct 2022 #19
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democracy for America»An Idea to encourage comp...»Reply #14