Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
8. I think a descent into absurdities does not invalidate the approach.
Wed Oct 2, 2013, 08:20 PM
Oct 2013

Yes, anything can be misused.

But evolution has a clear aim. Natural selection favors animals who can raise more children to maturity so that their genes are passed on. This is a fact.

As such, certain behaviors are favored. I am sure you don't deny this.

The question is not whether evolution has resulted in certain behavioral and cognitive differences, the question is only "how much".

Which behavior has the greater evolutionary advantage? Those are the behaviors that are selected -and if you accept that there is a link between brain structure and behavior, then you must accept that evolution has played a part in our behavior.

The ONLY argument is one of degree.

BTW, NONE of what I said is meant to deny the role of socialization in all of this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY I...»Reply #8