Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
Wed Nov 20, 2013, 01:02 AM Nov 2013

Look familiar? Just try to guess the source of this... [View all]

(In reference to pornorgraphy)

Q: Was the consent of all participants sufficient to make the porn shoot a morally defensible enterprise?

That’s a great question, and the one Conor takes up in his essay. To put it crudely, both Alan and I strongly believe that consent is not sufficient to make this a morally defensible enterprise. The fact that the young woman chose to be sexually abused in front of a crowd makes it more morally defensible than if she were compelled to suffer like this against her will, but her acts are not, in our judgment, rendered morally defensible because she consented to them.

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who do we know that routinely conflates consensual with non-consensual sexual activity? Major Nikon Nov 2013 #1
Ah, but you're wrong I think. Bonobo Nov 2013 #2
Actually the answer doesn't surprise me in the least Major Nikon Nov 2013 #8
I had an argument to that effect last night with two of them. Katashi_itto Nov 2013 #11
ANSWER HERE Bonobo Nov 2013 #3
Someone somewhere or other, not sure where, was speculating what it is about this topic which causes Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #4
I've never seen them single out gay or lesbian porn for the same criticism. lumberjack_jeff Nov 2013 #13
Yes means maybe and maybe means no. Bonobo Nov 2013 #16
No. No means no, and yes means Seeking Serenity Nov 2013 #17
unless you have an approved chaperone to give that consent for you loli phabay Nov 2013 #18
I'm not taking the time to read the article, but... TreasonousBastard Nov 2013 #5
also there is an issue that they believe porn is commercial rather than heavily amateur loli phabay Nov 2013 #6
Not so much that they believe, but... TreasonousBastard Nov 2013 #7
Commercial porn is pretty anemic in itself Major Nikon Nov 2013 #9
good points, the majority of specialised stuff nowadays is amateur interactive stuff loli phabay Nov 2013 #10
autonomy: they're doing it wrong. lumberjack_jeff Nov 2013 #12
Sounds like someone is trying very hard to claim down is up Major Nikon Nov 2013 #14
"When the theory doesn't match reality, one should question the theory, not reality." lumberjack_jeff Nov 2013 #15
Yes, that's rather silly. But why get up in arms about it? nomorenomore08 Nov 2013 #19
I'm not up in arms. Bonobo Nov 2013 #20
Okay. I didn't think you were really that upset about it. I was just kind of like, "Yeah. So?" nomorenomore08 Nov 2013 #21
Well I think the significance is this: Bonobo Nov 2013 #22
You may be right. I just don't spend much time worrying about others' hangups. n/t nomorenomore08 Nov 2013 #23
I wish I was more like you. Bonobo Nov 2013 #24
Seems odd... ElboRuum Nov 2013 #25
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Look familiar? Just try t...»Reply #0