Men's Group

Major Nikon

(36,917 posts)

8. Actually the answer doesn't surprise me in the least

Wed Nov 20, 2013, 08:25 AM

Nov 2013

You didn't really include enough information to pinpoint exactly who it was, but the only two groups of anti-pornographers I know about are social conservatives and radical feminists, both of which conflate consensual and non-consensual sexual activity. Then when you see the word "morally" you can narrow that down to the former.

I'm actually familiar with Rod Dreher. We get the Dallas Morning News here in the office(which is a rag not fit to line bird cages) and he wrote a collumn there for years. Rod Dreher is a pseudo-intellectual shitbag of the first order. If you've ever seen the movie, Red State, it's a fictional tale about a congregation that believes homosexuality is an infectious disease. That describes Rod Dreher. If he could make it legal to execute homosexuals, I'm sure he would. I wouldn't piss in his ear if his brain was on fire.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

25 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Look familiar? Just try to guess the source of this... [View all] Bonobo Nov 2013 OP

Who do we know that routinely conflates consensual with non-consensual sexual activity? Major Nikon Nov 2013 #1

Ah, but you're wrong I think. Bonobo Nov 2013 #2

Actually the answer doesn't surprise me in the least Major Nikon Nov 2013 #8

I had an argument to that effect last night with two of them. Katashi_itto Nov 2013 #11

ANSWER HERE Bonobo Nov 2013 #3

Someone somewhere or other, not sure where, was speculating what it is about this topic which causes Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #4

I've never seen them single out gay or lesbian porn for the same criticism. lumberjack_jeff Nov 2013 #13

Yes means maybe and maybe means no. Bonobo Nov 2013 #16

No. No means no, and yes means Seeking Serenity Nov 2013 #17

unless you have an approved chaperone to give that consent for you loli phabay Nov 2013 #18

I'm not taking the time to read the article, but... TreasonousBastard Nov 2013 #5

also there is an issue that they believe porn is commercial rather than heavily amateur loli phabay Nov 2013 #6

Not so much that they believe, but... TreasonousBastard Nov 2013 #7

Commercial porn is pretty anemic in itself Major Nikon Nov 2013 #9

good points, the majority of specialised stuff nowadays is amateur interactive stuff loli phabay Nov 2013 #10

autonomy: they're doing it wrong. lumberjack_jeff Nov 2013 #12

Sounds like someone is trying very hard to claim down is up Major Nikon Nov 2013 #14

"When the theory doesn't match reality, one should question the theory, not reality." lumberjack_jeff Nov 2013 #15

Yes, that's rather silly. But why get up in arms about it? nomorenomore08 Nov 2013 #19

I'm not up in arms. Bonobo Nov 2013 #20

Okay. I didn't think you were really that upset about it. I was just kind of like, "Yeah. So?" nomorenomore08 Nov 2013 #21

Well I think the significance is this: Bonobo Nov 2013 #22

You may be right. I just don't spend much time worrying about others' hangups. n/t nomorenomore08 Nov 2013 #23

I wish I was more like you. Bonobo Nov 2013 #24

Seems odd... ElboRuum Nov 2013 #25