Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
6. Results of your Jury Service
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 12:47 PM
Nov 2013
At Sun Nov 24, 2013, 12:36 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

The HoF is upset that women are now the icons/spiritual heads of the branches
http://www.democraticunderground.com/111411551

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

What the fuck kind of call out is this? This kind of over the top ridiculing and attacking makes DU suck.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Nov 24, 2013, 12:40 PM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No more than the continual call outs from the members of that group.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I don't see a problem. There was nothing rude or hurtful in the post. The poster is just making an observation.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Um, not really. It's a bit of inter group rivalry between protected groups, one of which is militantly so. The members of HoF indulge in exactly this sort of thing all the time. Deal with it.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: Ugly-assed callout. Can we please not do this shit? Thanks.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Only on DU do you see this Major Nikon Nov 2013 #1
I expect that from people who don't care about Democratic Party politics. nt ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #2
It's the mens group's fault Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #3
If I didn't know better... Bonobo Nov 2013 #4
Of course they're upset.. Upton Nov 2013 #5
Less? There is never LESS. nt Demo_Chris Nov 2013 #20
Results of your Jury Service LittleBlue Nov 2013 #6
Thanks for the info Major Nikon Nov 2013 #7
Oh ffs. HappyMe Nov 2013 #8
I think it's coming from people who don't much care about party politics ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #9
I think it's as you said. HappyMe Nov 2013 #10
And mind you, I'm not pushing for Warren to run ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #11
As far as I'm concerned, Clinton isn't all that electable. HappyMe Nov 2013 #12
For better or for worse, running is encoded into the Clinton DNA. I would be shocked if she didn't. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #13
I don't know. To me, the ability to fling an insult, HappyMe Nov 2013 #14
If Bill's recent potshot at the ACA and Obama is the sort of "triangulation" we can expect from Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #15
Yeah, that really pissed me off too. nt RiffRandell Nov 2013 #19
I honestly wish she wouldn't. RiffRandell Nov 2013 #16
But Bill Clinton would have easily been re-elected if he could have run again ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #17
Living here is a different story, and has made me extremely pessimistic RiffRandell Nov 2013 #18
Look, I don't want to hijack the thread but a couple things. RiffRandell Nov 2013 #21
No worries ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»The HoF is upset that wom...»Reply #6