Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: True or false? [View all]lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)11. If we can't agree on the definitions of words, then it's kind of pointless to talk about anything.
One can only defend the idea that "sexism against men" doesn't exist by arguing the point that "sexism" means bigotry and bias against women only.
The really funny thing is that the same people will make the argument that the flipside of sexism (against women, of course) is "benevolent sexism". No one has yet given me an example of benevolent sexism which cannot be more easily described and explained as sexism against men.
So, there are apparently only two kinds of sexism. Hostile and benevolent sexism against women. So, when men are given longer sentences for the same crime, this constitutes benevolent sexism against women.
I think this entire argument is itself proof that sexism against men is a thing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

The larger problem, I think, is that people confuse their labels and terms with objective reality.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2013
#2
If someone's opinion is based in subliteracy, I'm not sure how valuable that opinion is
Major Nikon
Aug 2013
#10
The belief that mothers are better parents doesn't come from nefarious intent.
lumberjack_jeff
Aug 2013
#15
If we can't agree on the definitions of words, then it's kind of pointless to talk about anything.
lumberjack_jeff
Aug 2013
#11
I salute you- and your dedication to that potentially Sisyphusian task.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2013
#19
Jeff is perfectly capable of explaining his own words, but I feel the need to mention, here:
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2013
#23
" Taking those 3 words totally out of context" - umm . . that was the first complete sentence.
ConcernedCanuk
Aug 2013
#24
I'm tired of seeing statements made in this group taken wildly & deliberately out of context.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2013
#26
No, I am not kidding and you are the one trying to shove a 4lb sack of garlic baloney
Tuesday Afternoon
Aug 2013
#34
perhaps they share power unequally. you men have your ways and women have their ways
Tuesday Afternoon
Aug 2013
#37
If men in power are in collusion to oppress women, they are doing a piss-poor job of it
Major Nikon
Sep 2013
#43
This stayed, obviously, and it was 6-0, but considering some of what goes on here...
TreasonousBastard
Sep 2013
#45
The alerter does not have the guts to come here and answer point by point....
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Sep 2013
#49
They know it's true, but an entire world-view depends on refusing to acknowledge it. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Sep 2013
#50
Kind of off topic, but this seems as good a place as any to share the wonderous stuff in my head.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2013
#52