Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiendish Thingy

(18,689 posts)
6. Lying with statistics
Thu Oct 27, 2022, 02:30 PM
Oct 2022

That top 20% group wasn’t pulled out of a hat…it was almost certainly selected because it crossed the 50% threshold. In BC, lots of two income professional households cross the $227,000 income mark (remember that’s in Canadian dollars)

Not mentioned is the concentration of wealth within the income groups, such as the total wealth held by the top 5%, 1%, etc. Wealth inequality isn’t as dramatic in Canada as it is in the US, but it’s still there.

The Fraser institute is just looking for a rationale to cut the top tax rates, and raise taxes on the middle class.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Top 20 per cent pay 61 pe...»Reply #6