Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Codifer

(776 posts)
4. It may not be that much a problem with the 737, it is an old design.
Fri Apr 14, 2023, 02:34 PM
Apr 2023

The freaking bean counters pushed it past capability in order to compete with the newer design Airbus. Designing a new aircraft would take years.... and the Douglas Aircraft bosses look only at the bottom line and the stock prices.

That was the beginning of the problems at Boeing... that horrid merger with Douglas Aircraft. Douglas had already shown the world what little regard they have for anything but that bottom line.... remember the DC 10 and the faulty cargo bay door which could blow out at altitude, and did in France, killing 350 or so people.

Not Douglas but Ford bean counters figured that it would be cheaper to pay wrongful death lawsuits than it would cost to safeguard the Pinto gas tank to prevent its explosion in a rear end collision. They looked at the bottom line.

Engineers and ONLY engineers should dictate design. NEVER the freaking bean counters.

btw, there are two excellent documentaries on the Douglas/Boeing merger and the 737 Max debacle. I think might be on Prime.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»"Plane maker Boeing said ...»Reply #4