Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tansy_Gold

(18,060 posts)
3. This was one textbook for a class I took . . .
Wed Apr 26, 2023, 11:54 AM
Apr 2023

. . . in the middle of the 2000 election. I told the professor I thought it was the stupidest, most biased text of the three or four we had to read and he was aghast that anyone would challenge Polsby & Wildavsky, who were supposed to be unbiased, neutral "experts" on the subject.

I told him, "Anyone who puts 'picturesque slum' in print is NOT unbiased."

I've long suspected that the ~40% of eligible voters who don't vote do so out of disgust with the candidates as well as with the other voters. 2000 was a farce of corruption that paved the way for 2016. Anyone who believed non-rich voters chose 💩 out of "economic insecurity" was out of their mind. And any country that allows itself to be governed by the minority is a failed state, neither a democracy nor a "democratic republic." And it's only going to get worse, as states like TX take away even the appearance of an election. Why go to the trouble to cast a ballot when you KNOW it won't be counted?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Wed...»Reply #3