Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(36,330 posts)
1. TX doesn't do a completely abysmal job.
Sat May 16, 2015, 06:28 PM
May 2015

At least not at the 4th/8th grade levels.

But they did better with "truth telling" before the STAAR test. That's at least partly an artefact. The test was new and they were calibrating it. They set the bar for "proficient" low because teachers weren't up to teaching to that particular test yet. It's like the current HS biology STAAR test. 38% is required for passing, not just terribly far above random chance.

Making it worse is the strategy that they've said they have on the STAAR: 1/4 of the questions are "entry level," things that most kids should be able to do really well on. 1/2 are at the level they want kids to be at. 1/4 are a bit more challenging, so that "recommended" or whatever the above-average category is really does mean "above average."

I look forward to the 2015 NAEP results, and might take the time to look for the HS-level results.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»Many states mislead the p...»Reply #1