Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
4. We've been told
Sun Sep 21, 2014, 01:49 PM
Sep 2014

that no teacher is "distinguished" except for momentarily in any given area. Our admins have been trained to make sure that rating someone "distinguished" in any particular Danielson domain is very rare.

So is rating someone "basic," as a teacher has to be pretty damned weak to fit that part of the rubric. And, despite the perpetual public outcry against "bad teachers," very few are that weak. So the vast majority of teachers end up being rated "proficient" in most or all of the domains.

There's a hell of a lot of paperwork, check-lists, and teacher and admin time thrown into the process for predictable results.

Edited to add: Not NY, which is why our designations are different, even though we're using Danielson. We've got "unsatisfactory," "basic," "proficient," and "distinguished."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»New York State Teacher Ev...»Reply #4