Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

hunter

(39,093 posts)

4. It's too bad we are not building these continuously. Finish one, move on to the next.

Reply to NNadir (Original post)

Thu May 2, 2024, 10:37 AM

May 2024

That might reduce costs considerably.

We really ought to be a ban new fossil fuel power plants, even those required to support our renewable energy follies.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Vogon_Glory

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Vogtle 3 and Vogtle 4 Nuclear Reactors Are Now Providing Commercial Power to Georgia. [View all] NNadir Apr 2024 OP

Your cost numbers may be off. SarahD Apr 2024 #1

Antinukes throw numbers around all the time, but seldom have a reputable reference for them. NNadir Apr 2024 #2

Not that it matters, but here's 30 billion dollars. SarahD May 2024 #3

It is astounding how readily antinukes love to quote the right wing Red Baiter Lewis Strauss's 1954... NNadir May 2024 #7

It's too bad we are not building these continuously. Finish one, move on to the next. hunter May 2024 #4

The Poles will do exactly that with the same design. NNadir May 2024 #5

My new favorite poster Ontheboundry May 2024 #6