Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(34,757 posts)
5. I don't have any problem with this; electricity isn't, despite indecent advertising, "green."
Sat May 18, 2024, 02:44 AM
May 2024

World production of electricity is dominated by dangerous fossil fuels; and despite much advertising to the contrary, so called "renewable energy" is neither sustainable nor significant. The expenditure of trillion dollar sums on solar and wind has had no other effect other than to make climate change accelerate.

Numbers don't lie.

Batteries are not sustainable either, because, like so called "renewable energy" their mass intensity is ridiculous; and even were it not, as a consequence of the 2nd law of thermodynamics, waste energy. The 2nd law of thermodynamics is not subject to repeal by advertising.

The idea that electric cars are "green," is absurd in the extreme. Electricity is already a thermodynamically degraded form of energy; the use of batteries degrades it further.

It has been shown that on my grid, the PJM grid, electric cars have a higher carbon impact than hybrid cars, which is not to say that hybrid cars - for full transparency I own one - are sustainable either. They are not.

I had a brief post on this here:

A paper addressing the idea that electric cars are "green."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Nearly all major car comp...»Reply #5