Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Showing Original Post only (View all)

OKIsItJustMe

(21,016 posts)
Fri Aug 2, 2024, 12:52 PM Aug 2024

AP: Protecting against floods, or a government-mandated retreat from the shore? New Jersey rules debated [View all]

https://apnews.com/article/climate-change-building-coastal-flooding-sandy-f8d7efea94f163aee5dd63f362d29522
Protecting against floods, or a government-mandated retreat from the shore? New Jersey rules debated

BY WAYNE PARRY
Updated 5:30 PM EDT, August 1, 2024

TOMS RIVER, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey officials are defending proposed building rules designed to limit damage from future storms and steadily rising seas in coastal areas, countering criticism that the state aims to force people away from the Jersey Shore by making it harder and more expensive to build or rebuild there.

Lawmakers from both parties held a hearing Thursday in Toms River, one of the hardest-hit communities by Superstorm Sandy, to discuss the state’s Protecting Against Climate Threats initiative and respond to criticism of the proposal from business interests.

Mandated by an 2020 executive order from Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy, the proposed rules are designed to account for rising seas and a changing climate in making land use decisions near the ocean, bays and rivers in an effort to limit damage from future storms.

The rules would extend the jurisdiction of flood control measures further inland, require buildings to be constructed five feet (1.5 meters) higher off the ground than current rules call for, and require elevating roadways in flood-prone areas.

People should be “free” to do whatever they want. First off, let’s repeal all zoning laws. Next, let’s repeal all speed limits. Oh, and seatbelt laws. Next, I demand that under the 2nd amendment, I have a right to own fully automatic weapons. …

You understand of course that when the next “Superstorm” hits, I will expect the emergency crews to rescue my family from the floodwaters, without consideration of their own lives.

(Obligatory tag.)
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»AP: Protecting against fl...»Reply #0