Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(34,759 posts)
3. Well, we have to keep in mind that the worst nuclear reactor is still better than the best fossil fuel plant.
Tue Aug 20, 2024, 11:06 PM
Aug 2024

One has to navigate a number of issues in dealing with complex technology; one of those is the supply chain. It's probably cheaper and easier to do things the old way; more difficult to be innovative, since efforts at innovation can be costly simply because not everything works the first time.

There are some innovative approaches in the new era of nuclear creativity. For example, although I'm not really a FLIBE (BeF2/LiF eutectic) kind of guy, Kairos has made an effort to bring this new supply chain issue forward for its high temperature reactors. For FLIBE it is probably still true that the optimal structural material is probably that developed in the 1960's, the nickel alloys Inconels and/or Hastelloys. (I say that without being, as my son is, a materials scientist.)

In my own thinking, I have tended not to pay much attention to sodium cooled fast breeders in any other than a general sense. I'm more of a "breed and burn" kind of guy, which work rather like a candle, as Sekimoto put it, although I would modify the concept by employing liquid metal fuels, low melting plutonium alloys, of which there are many of note. This would require, I admit, quite a bit of research, almost certainly costly research.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»India's Most Advanced Nuc...»Reply #3