Toyota's Controversial 1:6:90 Rule: Prioritizing Hybrids Over EVs

[CoopersDad]

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Toyota seems to have an agenda against EVs.

And, their "vision" conveniently fails to consider the fossil fuels required to run hybrids and PHEVs. There's a place for these as part of the solution, but Toyota's math is cherry-picking to make a point.

Toyota's Controversial 1-6-90 Rule Rule: Prioritizing Hybrids Over EVs

Toyota's 1-6-90 Rule is a controversial strategy the company has outlined to prioritize hybrid vehicles over fully electric vehicles. According to the leaked internal documents:

The 1-6-90 Rule Rule states that the raw materials required to manufacture one battery electric vehicle could alternatively be used to make 6 plug-in hybrid vehicles or 90 traditional hybrid vehicles.

Toyota argues that the overall carbon reduction achieved by these 90 hybrids over their lifetime is 37 times greater than that of a single-battery electric vehicle.

The rationale behind this rule is that Toyota believes there are significant challenges with widespread EV adoption, including limited critical mineral supply, insufficient charging infrastructure, and high vehicle costs.

Toyota sees hybrids as a more accessible and impactful solution in the near term to reduce emissions rather than focusing primarily on more expensive and resource-intensive EVs.

However, critics argue that Toyota's reluctance to embrace EVs fully could hinder innovation and progress in the EV industry, which many see as crucial for long-term emissions reduction.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/toyotas-controversial-1690-rule-prioritizing-hybrids-over-bhardwaj-ubcfc/

Coincidentally, here's a fun widget to work with that I discovered when researching this topic.
I can't vouch for it's accuracy but it could be useful!

https://smallsuv.carghg.org/