Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
2. I like to think an actual attack that materially
Sun Jul 15, 2018, 04:08 PM
Jul 2018

hurt people's wellbeing would backfire on Putin (but conservatives are so focused against us these days that maybe they'd just follow the Kremlin/Trump line and blame it on Democrats). Coats doesn't support that notion of deterrence, though, quite the contrary.

The biggest lack that bothers me is actually communications ability if grid affecting us went down, because our family, like most, is so spread out. Even assuming vehicles were running, it's likely authorities would close the roads. Walk 40 miles to the nearest relatives to make sure an adult's at home with the children? My husband and I bought an inexpensive broadband receiver on sale one year, mainly though because commercial stations would come under government control in emergency and historically have provided limited information. But currently no one has the ability to send, though one of our kids has a friend who's a ham, wherever he lives.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Frugal and Energy Efficient Living»DNI Dan Coats said cyber ...»Reply #2