Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eomer

(3,845 posts)
26. A tentative proposal.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 08:15 PM
Dec 2011

After further thought, it seems to me that this group's Statement of Purpose should be amended. I think the hosts of this group need something in the Statement that will let them lock threads that are too far out and especially let them block members who live consistently in a place that is too far out.

Granted that the new DU Terms of Service place limits on really far out topics and the Terms of Service apply in this group like everywhere else. But I expect we will see an inconsistent application of those rules if it is left to random juries who haven't focused on this kind of subject. If we could incorporate those same limits and, if I had my preference, even slightly tighter limits into the Statement of Purpose then hosts of this group would have the authority to enforce them. Those hosts would be much better equipped to do so than most DU members chosen at random.

I think the hosts will need such a tool in order to be effective stewards of this group.

Of course, I recognize the special challenge the admins have to deal with in this arena and will respect whatever judgments they make.

On edit: hang on maybe this can be construed to be what I was looking for -- the Statement of Purpose has the following sentence at the end: "When posting, please be mindful of the DU Terms of Service." Maybe that is enough. Thoughts? (Sorry that you're seeing my messy thinking-out-loud.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

i wonder if the hosts will lock my next op. ret5hd Dec 2011 #1
why yes. yes they did. ret5hd Dec 2011 #2
They can't hide posts. Posts have to be reviewed by a jury if they are alerted on. Grateful for Hope Dec 2011 #3
Why are Chemtrails a no, no on DU3? Sorry, I don't understand this! n/t teddy51 Dec 2011 #4
This is an admin call. Grateful for Hope Dec 2011 #5
Ok, I get that but what is the problem with that discussion, is what I am trying to teddy51 Dec 2011 #7
Read the Terms of Service. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #8
because not enough people look up? getdown Dec 2011 #6
Because the whole topic is obvious bullshit. Codeine Dec 2011 #29
+1000! n/t zappaman Dec 2011 #30
An exerpt from something I recently posted in the Host Group Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #9
That's great, Joe, but we are all called on to do that, not just hosts. eomer Dec 2011 #10
The intent of what I was saying was not clear then... Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #11
I think that is laudable... eomer Dec 2011 #12
As you wish, ignore what is said Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #13
Not getting your meaning. eomer Dec 2011 #14
Well... Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #15
maybe we can reframe this OnTheOtherHand Dec 2011 #16
"hosts have a special responsibility to do that" - Absolutly, yes Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #18
I suppose that... OnTheOtherHand Dec 2011 #23
re: "Do any of us have thoughts about how?" eomer Dec 2011 #19
I'm not sure what sort of pledge I would want to take, there OnTheOtherHand Dec 2011 #22
I'm not sure either. eomer Dec 2011 #24
Oh, I guess it's a historical perspective that makes me think that way. eomer Dec 2011 #17
I would agree with that Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #20
Yikes, we agree. (What do we do now?) eomer Dec 2011 #21
I sent a PM to Lithos Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #25
Reading your knowledgeable posts, and thinking you'd be a great choice as a group/forum host. (nt) T S Justly Jan 2012 #33
I also think eomer would be a good choice for an group host here. n/t Bolo Boffin Jan 2012 #34
Lithos has added me as a host. eomer Jan 2012 #35
Joe, compared to DU2 (mods) Grateful for Hope Dec 2011 #32
A tentative proposal. eomer Dec 2011 #26
I don't think the TOS provide ideal guidance for the group OnTheOtherHand Dec 2011 #27
There is already an alert for this Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #28
OK, thanks, together with several other far out posters having privileges revoked recently... eomer Dec 2011 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»There doesn't seem to be ...»Reply #26