Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

al bupp

(2,368 posts)

4. Unless a Twitter thread makes it so, I fail to see any glibness on Anderson's part

Reply to intrepidity (Reply #3)

Thu May 13, 2021, 11:26 PM

May 2021

Nevertheless he very well may be wrong, while Baltimore and Wade are right. As a layman, I'm hardly qualified to critique either hypothesis on technical grounds, and so must rely upon the logic and evidence presented. Even Wade makes clear in his article that to date there's no solid proof for one or the other origin story, just what amounts to the weight of circumstantial evidence. Anderson's argument below makes some points that at least pass my sniff test:

Link to tweet

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Investigate the origins of COVID-19 [View all] intrepidity May 2021 OP

my understanding is that the reason it is important to janterry May 2021 #1

Fauci himself was quite clear this question needs more research & investigation al bupp May 2021 #2

Andersen is being glib about the issue intrepidity May 2021 #3

Unless a Twitter thread makes it so, I fail to see any glibness on Anderson's part al bupp May 2021 #4

Andersen frequently battles straw men, from my observation intrepidity May 2021 #5