Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Make7

(8,547 posts)
10. The script might have been better just using posts from the DU2 S11 forum.
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 06:45 PM
Feb 2012

There were many discussions that were more informative and well researched than the script excerpt they included at the linked article. Although I did find their script to be the best part - perhaps they are currently rewriting it to make it sound remotely believable. This was my favorite exchange:

[div class="excerpt" style="border: 1px solid #bfbfbf; border-radius: 0.5385em; box-shadow: 2px 2px 4px #bfbfbf inset;"]DR. SLOAN: By free-fall do you mean as fast as if you dropped a bowling ball from the roof and it fell down to the ground without any resistance?

MR. GAGE: It's basic physics - the same laws of physics Isaac Newton discovered over 300 years ago.

DR. SLOAN: So if NIST's fire theory violates these laws then it must be wrong?

MR. GAGE: Not even George W. Bush could have written a signing statement that can invalidate the laws of physics.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»A New 9/11 Investigation ...»Reply #10