Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,921 posts)
9. I wonder if there's a way to rig juries
Thu Feb 9, 2012, 04:51 PM
Feb 2012

so that alerts in the Feminist group would be handled by juries made up of members of that group.

As you indicated, alerts will draw jurors from anywhere, who are judging posts in a forum that to some extent has its own language. Or at least it has very specific definitions for certain words. No way jurors are going to learn the language, not from a few posts.

Then, because some jurors made a "wrong" decision, the arguments are brought up in H&M, complete with more links back to the Feminist forum, compounding the problem.

I don't know what to make of "closed" or "protected" forums, but if we're going to have them, the software should support/enforce the closure.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Get it off the latest page. WingDinger Feb 2012 #1
ah... but then you guys wont knwo to come in here and participate in topics you are interested in seabeyond Feb 2012 #2
Maybe a non contentious feminist page, only for edification and WingDinger Feb 2012 #3
huh? lol. you are over my head in org and tech skill, lol seabeyond Feb 2012 #4
"Have a thread in meta" - can somebody translate this into English?? kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #5
meta... meta and help forum. it is where gripes go. thread.... seabeyond Feb 2012 #6
I like this idea wildflower Feb 2012 #7
you are the 3rd or 4th to suggest that on the blocking. one warning.... and boom seabeyond Feb 2012 #8
I wonder if there's a way to rig juries JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2012 #9
There isn't any way to do what you suggest. laconicsax Feb 2012 #19
I don't think that is necessary. All groups should uphold DU community standards, imo. yardwork Feb 2012 #28
That's a good and long overdue proposal... Violet_Crumble Feb 2012 #10
after posting this, i had a post hidden. i so wanted to start another thread. but took it to meta. seabeyond Feb 2012 #11
Your thread in Meta has turned out to be very good, lots of good discussion there. yardwork Feb 2012 #12
i think it did, too seabeyond Feb 2012 #13
.... yardwork Feb 2012 #14
Wouldn't that be using the Help & Meta forum as this group's trash heap? UnrepentantLiberal Feb 2012 #15
no. it would be used to address issues we have on du. and i think that is absolutely the intent seabeyond Feb 2012 #16
It would be using Help & Meta to stage toxic flame wars you'd rather not have in this forum. UnrepentantLiberal Feb 2012 #17
it would eb using meta as intended to address the issues at du instead of the forum seabeyond Feb 2012 #18
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #20
we are being "nice ladies" and not even warning them. the poster felt the need to take it to META seabeyond Feb 2012 #21
I see the thread in Meta, but I don't read it as a call-out of you or of your post here. yardwork Feb 2012 #26
flame wars as opposed to issues concerning du, is a reasonable and respectful? nt seabeyond Feb 2012 #31
Please show me the quote. I may be being dense. yardwork Feb 2012 #32
Since when do you get to decide who has "no fucking business in this forum"? LeftyMom Feb 2012 #22
they are not talking about feminist issues. they are breaking the SOP rules. seabeyond Feb 2012 #23
Discussing how the group is run is certainly on-topic. LeftyMom Feb 2012 #24
Where are SOP rules being broken in this thread? yardwork Feb 2012 #27
this is about disrupting the feminist forum. nt seabeyond Feb 2012 #29
???? I am not trying to be difficult, I really don't see it. yardwork Feb 2012 #30
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #25
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Feminists»i would like to make a pr...»Reply #9