Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
LGBT vs. Feminists (new rule proposed - and why I think this is a non issue that should die now) [View all]
Last edited Tue Feb 14, 2012, 03:14 PM - Edit history (1)
I think we all hashed out the nature of iverglas's being blocked and why she was unblocked.
That discussion went off the rails and was once more being used to fight the IMAGINARY battle of which identity is more important, LGBT or Feminist.
I would like to propose a new rule.
Nobody gets to bring up which thing should be paramount. IF and ONLY if an issue arises in which that distinction is somehow meaningful, will that particular discussion be acceptable.
Please let me know your thoughts about this proposed rule.
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LGBT vs. Feminists (new rule proposed - and why I think this is a non issue that should die now) [View all]
redqueen
Feb 2012
OP
works for me.... and when/if it comes up, adult talk or dont do. lol. listen and speak
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#1
I think the vast majority of members of both groups support each other
The empressof all
Feb 2012
#7
I wasn't planning on rehashing that anyways, so I am cool with your new rule.
ZombieHorde
Feb 2012
#31