A proposal.

[laconicsax]

2. Can you name a jury results post that didn't go down the path I described?

Hell, there are a one or two active ones in H&M right now.

Here's how those posts have consistently gone since DU3 went live:

OP: I can't believe the jury didn't vote to hide this outrageously sexist language
Form responses: "The Brits use it," "I use it," "The person who used it is no misogynist," "They were using this term for female genitalia to insult a man, so the intent was not to be misogynistic," "I can't stand the PC police," "It's just a word."

The discussion then becomes about those red herrings and rationalizations, the two sides dig in, and nothing changes. This isn't a difference of opinion (as some jurors would put it), it's the difference between respecting women and knocking them over then kicking them when they're down.

The main reason why nothing has changed is because of the deeply ingrained sexism in society. Misogynists are bigots and for the most part, bigots don't change until they're forced to do so. The admins started forcing that change with respect to homophobia, they can do the same with respect to misogyny.