Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(106,574 posts)
1. That is one that will be widely open to misinterpretation and anti-vaxxers/CT proponents will
Wed May 1, 2024, 05:38 AM
May 2024

undoubtedly run with it before the actual published/peer-reviewed study can be fully evaluated and experts discuss it. These "straight to media" publication approaches are not helpful. Years ago when leading major MSM had actual science writers (and qualified editors) it was not such a problem. Now, I have doubts that many who write on these issues have much (if any) relevant background education--nor know who to talk to about what they don't understand.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Scientists tried to give ...»Reply #1