Mental Health Support

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)

12. It unfortunately requires identification and discussion of another MHSG member/DUer

Thu Feb 7, 2013, 08:47 AM

Feb 2013

as a non-party to the discussion. That's something done fairly regularly within the framework of Meta and the definition of metadiscussion is discussion about discussion which this is.

Perhaps Tobin or one of the other founders of the group can comment on whether MHSG has always had a practice of allowing originating posts that include callouts. If that's not the case, perhaps Mo can comment on whether MSHG is turning to a new policy.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] BainsBane Feb 2013 OP

That person should probably be blocked from this group. Tobin S. Feb 2013 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author BainsBane Feb 2013 #2

I can see how that PM was taken the wrong way Tobin S. Feb 2013 #3

+1 kickysnana Feb 2013 #13

It sucks when you try to do the right thing and people take it the wrong way. Denninmi Feb 2013 #4

I was just wondering about you BainsBane Feb 2013 #5

Fine. TY for asking. Denninmi Feb 2013 #8

This is a topic for Meta-discussion HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #6

no, it isn't BainsBane Feb 2013 #7

Agree. Denninmi Feb 2013 #9

It unfortunately requires identification and discussion of another MHSG member/DUer HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #12

I disagree. But if you want to make it about MHSG practice then... HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #10

on rereading the post BainsBane Feb 2013 #11

And IMO it would have been best worked out between the two of you. HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #15

I see your point BainsBane Feb 2013 #16

+1 kickysnana Feb 2013 #14