Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wnylib

(25,190 posts)
14. I have seen a family tree for one
Sun Nov 21, 2021, 11:23 AM
Nov 2021

branch of my grandmother's family that also goes back to Adam and Eve. It is accurate for several generations, but then veers off the rails to claim an ancestral connection between some Welsh and Scottish names in the British Isles to "Celts" of the Middle East who supposedly traced back to some Israeli tribes, and from there to Adam and Eve. In making the connection to ancient Israel, several centuries were condensed until the end result was 6000 years ago for Adam and Eve.

I've also seen other listings (not my family's) at Ancestry based on info taken from LDS records that have names and dates so jumbled that there is a gap of 2 centuries between a father and son.

Even census records are only as accurate as the person who spoke to the census taker, and dependent on the census taker's listening skills.

My aunt found an amusing census entry for an ancestor in my grandfather's family. The man's first name was Gottlieb. The census taker recorded it as Cutlip due to the ancestor's accent, and the place of birth as Bear, Germany. But he was actually from a German speaking family in Bern, Switzerland.

Ancestry and LDS listings are only clues or guides. They have to be verified by further research.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think if you have an account you can do it. Ocelot II Nov 2021 #1
I found it too intrusive, and got off it. secondwind Nov 2021 #2
I actually leave some incorrect information on my trees Sherman A1 Nov 2021 #3
I get your point, but facts are facts bucolic_frolic Nov 2021 #5
No, they're not. Buckeye_Democrat Nov 2021 #13
I have seen a family tree for one wnylib Nov 2021 #14
Absolutely! I especially learned to question... Buckeye_Democrat Nov 2021 #15
I am on Ancestry all the time, it is a hobby of mine. Irish_Dem Nov 2021 #4
Ugh mahina Nov 2021 #6
You don't correct other people's trees. You make your own. njhoneybadger Nov 2021 #7
I had a family tree done in 1895 or so. I felt an obligation to put it applegrove Nov 2021 #8
Imagine finding your 1895 tree expanded with 3 times the number of people in your families bucolic_frolic Nov 2021 #9
Yes. For me I wasn't afraid of mistakes, I can see how aggravating that would be. For me it applegrove Nov 2021 #10
OK - you need to realize this isn't how Ancestry works. Algernon Moncrieff Nov 2021 #11
Yes, I'm beginning to realize bucolic_frolic Nov 2021 #12
I've actually hired them on and with my finding out stuff they were pretty successful Historic NY Jul 2022 #19
A lot of family trees are completely inaccurate csziggy Apr 2022 #16
If it's a family tree, and you have an account Montauk6 Jul 2022 #17
Lots of people jumble stuff they think is theirs.... Historic NY Jul 2022 #18
True surnames may timms139 Mar 2024 #20
The census takers in any given area tended to be the ethnicity of earlier immigrants bucolic_frolic Mar 2024 #21
Supposedly my grandfather had a... duncang Jun 2024 #22
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Ancestry/Genealogy»How do you correct inform...»Reply #14