Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gardening

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)

5. What made me ask is that Skinner wrote that groups could decide to do without one.

Reply to Little Star (Reply #4)

Sun Dec 11, 2011, 09:44 PM

Dec 2011

Even if a disruptor appears in an unhosted group there's the option of alerting on the OP and letting a jury decide. That would leave disruptors who only reply as an unresolved problem.

I do like your idea that the hosts can act like IRL hosts by showing a n00b the ropes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Now that we're beyond the beta review, does this group need hosts? [View all] Gormy Cuss Dec 2011 OP

probably doesn't need a host because of disruptors but would love NRaleighLiberal maddezmom Dec 2011 #1

That's how I feel too. beac Dec 2011 #2

Other than blocking disruptive types, there's only one real advantage to having group hosts Gormy Cuss Dec 2011 #3

I agree, for that reason alone every group needs a host... Little Star Dec 2011 #4

What made me ask is that Skinner wrote that groups could decide to do without one. Gormy Cuss Dec 2011 #5

What's that now? XemaSab Dec 2011 #6

Yes. What if we get a Monsanto troll trying to smash the group? HopeHoops Dec 2011 #7