Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

fightthegoodfightnow

(7,042 posts)
5. HHhhhhmm
Tue Oct 9, 2012, 08:19 PM
Oct 2012

It was one step backward....but no pain, no gain.

I agree that incrementalism often works in tandem with activism...and activism can cause pushback.

I did not vote for Clinton's re-election but in hind sight I was perhaps too tough on him. He did further the conversation even if DOMA or DADT were steps backwards.

Activism often creates the safe space for incrementalists to negotiate the terms of surrender.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Serious Question ... [View all] 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 OP
I was not in favor of DADT . . . fleur-de-lisa Sep 2012 #1
Do you see ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #2
Kind of, but as I wrote earlier . . . fleur-de-lisa Sep 2012 #3
You really think ... 1StrongBlackMan Sep 2012 #4
HHhhhhmm fightthegoodfightnow Oct 2012 #5
Question fightthegoodfightnow Oct 2012 #6
Further? ... 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2012 #7
Thanks for Responding fightthegoodfightnow Oct 2012 #8
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»LGBT Civil Rights and Activism»Serious Question ...»Reply #5