Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Drug Policy
Showing Original Post only (View all)DEA ends its monopoly on marijuana growing for medical research [View all]
DEA ends its monopoly on marijuana growing for medical research
{difficulty linking picture}
Marijuana plants fill a grow room in the University of Mississippi research lab, the only such site under contract with the federal government. (Brandon Dill / For The Los Angeles Times)
By Evan Halper
evan.halper@latimes.com
http://twitter.com/evanhalper
August 11, 2016, 9:50 AM | Reporting from Washington
The federal government is ending its decades-old monopoly on marijuana production for medical research as the Drug Enforcement Agency announced Thursday it was bowing to changing times. ... The agency said it would begin allowing researchers and drug companies to use pot grown in places other than its well-secured facility at the University of Mississippi.
But the agency did not make the bigger plunge toward marijuana legalization that many lawmakers have been advocating. It passed on a proposal to remove cannabis from the federal governments most dangerous category of narcotics. The drug continues to be classified as more dangerous than cocaine. ... Even so, the agencys shift on pot used for research purposes will have wide-reaching implications. It is aimed at increasing the amount and variety of marijuana available to scientists seeking to develop particular strains of the drug to treat ailments.
....
Related: Hold that blueberry pie; the Oregon state fair is now judging best marijuana
The DEA will invite growers other than the University of Mississippi to apply for licenses, but warns the number of such licenses granted will be limited and the rules for qualifying will be strict. It implied that big growers who have been selling pot legally in the states may be boxed out of the market, as the DEA will favor manufacturers that have followed its rules and have a proven track record working with controlled substances.
Other potential growers might include big agricultural and pharmaceutical companies that have been pondering entering the pot market but have sat on the sidelines, waiting for the DEA to loosen its rules. The DEA says the new policy is designed to enable companies seeking to market particular strains of marijuana as prescription drugs to start developing products. ... Under the new approach, should the state of scientific knowledge advance in the future such that a marijuana-derived drug is shown to be safe and effective for medical use, pharmaceutical firms will have a legal means of producing such drugs in the United States independent of the [federal government] contracting process, the agency wrote.
{difficulty linking picture}
Marijuana plants fill a grow room in the University of Mississippi research lab, the only such site under contract with the federal government. (Brandon Dill / For The Los Angeles Times)
By Evan Halper
evan.halper@latimes.com
http://twitter.com/evanhalper
August 11, 2016, 9:50 AM | Reporting from Washington
The federal government is ending its decades-old monopoly on marijuana production for medical research as the Drug Enforcement Agency announced Thursday it was bowing to changing times. ... The agency said it would begin allowing researchers and drug companies to use pot grown in places other than its well-secured facility at the University of Mississippi.
But the agency did not make the bigger plunge toward marijuana legalization that many lawmakers have been advocating. It passed on a proposal to remove cannabis from the federal governments most dangerous category of narcotics. The drug continues to be classified as more dangerous than cocaine. ... Even so, the agencys shift on pot used for research purposes will have wide-reaching implications. It is aimed at increasing the amount and variety of marijuana available to scientists seeking to develop particular strains of the drug to treat ailments.
....
Related: Hold that blueberry pie; the Oregon state fair is now judging best marijuana
The DEA will invite growers other than the University of Mississippi to apply for licenses, but warns the number of such licenses granted will be limited and the rules for qualifying will be strict. It implied that big growers who have been selling pot legally in the states may be boxed out of the market, as the DEA will favor manufacturers that have followed its rules and have a proven track record working with controlled substances.
Other potential growers might include big agricultural and pharmaceutical companies that have been pondering entering the pot market but have sat on the sidelines, waiting for the DEA to loosen its rules. The DEA says the new policy is designed to enable companies seeking to market particular strains of marijuana as prescription drugs to start developing products. ... Under the new approach, should the state of scientific knowledge advance in the future such that a marijuana-derived drug is shown to be safe and effective for medical use, pharmaceutical firms will have a legal means of producing such drugs in the United States independent of the [federal government] contracting process, the agency wrote.
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DEA ends its monopoly on marijuana growing for medical research [View all]
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2016
OP
that's a fucking consolation prize to attempt to cover their completely bullshit decision.
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2016
#1
Other potential growers might include big agricultural and pharmaceutical companies
misterhighwasted
Aug 2016
#2
I am more interested in the value of helping those in need rather than complaining
Thinkingabout
Aug 2016
#5
They probably will charge lots, but the benefits are important to those in need.
Thinkingabout
Aug 2016
#14