Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Anon-C

(3,440 posts)
2. I think there's some misdirection at foot here.
Tue Jan 9, 2018, 04:34 PM
Jan 2018

Equipping SLBMs with just their "fission primary" warheads doesn't make much sense tactically or strategically, imho. They are low-yield but "dirty" and unnecessarily fall-out producing...essentially "a-bombs" like Fat Man.


I suspect the US has deployable (loll...autocorrect wanted to say deplorable) "pure fusion" warheads ...thermonuclear weapons that don't require a fission primary. These weapons could in theory be made to low-yield, and would be much "cleaner&quot pardon my euphemism) and less fallout producing.

These are the kinds of nukes they would want to have to contemplate a greater range of options for their use, tragically.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»US to loosen nuclear weap...»Reply #2