Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

National Security & Defense

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Eugene

(62,869 posts)
Mon Jan 21, 2019, 12:58 PM Jan 2019

Russia acknowledges new missile but says it does not breach treaty [View all]

Source: Reuters

WORLD NEWS JANUARY 21, 2019 / 6:05 AM / UPDATED 3 HOURS AGO

Russia acknowledges new missile but says it does not breach treaty

Stephanie Nebehay, Robin Emmott
3 MIN READ

GENEVA/BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Russia has recognized the existence of a cruise missile system that has prompted Washington to say it will quit the 1987 INF disarmament treaty, but has denied that it violates the pact, U.S. officials and NATO diplomats said on Monday.

Two weeks before the planned U.S. withdrawal from the treaty, which keeps nuclear-capable missiles out of Europe, Washington’s disarmament ambassador in Geneva said there was still time for Russia to destroy the system.

But after a session of the U.N.-sponsored Conference on Disarmament, Russian diplomat Alexander Deyneko told Reuters: “We shall not yield to any ultimatums like to liquidate or to eliminate (a) missile that doesn’t fall within the range of the treaty prohibitions.”

Russia had denied developing what U.S. intelligence calls the SSC-8/9M729 cruise missile system.

-snip-


Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-nuclear-russia/russia-acknowledges-new-missile-but-says-it-does-not-breach-treaty-idUSKCN1PF0ZV
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Russia acknowledges new m...»Reply #0