Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

soryang

(3,307 posts)
3. This case is about the scope of the Federal Tort Claims waiver
Tue Sep 3, 2019, 01:36 PM
Sep 2019

Normally, tort suits cannot be brought against the United States based upon intentional torts, such as assault, battery, false imprisonment, etc., namely the causes of action brought in this case. The Federal tort claims act is an exception to the general principle of sovereign immunity. But sovereign immunity still applies to intentional tort suits brought against employees of the US. It does not apply to "officers of the United States," with the powers described in the decision. This includes TSA screeners at the airport.

An individual suit against a TSA screener as a practical matter is worthless in most cases, the cause of action needs to accrue against the United States itself to insure proper respect for constitutional principles.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Judges say travelers can ...»Reply #3