Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

qazplm135

(7,591 posts)
1. The problem with CID
Thu May 6, 2021, 02:40 PM
May 2021

is not who runs it, but who it uses to conduct investigations.

To become a CID agent they seek out E4s and E5s. Train them, and turn them into "special agents."

There are a few warrant officers sprinkled in, but primarily it is an enlisted/NCO run organization.

Now, we have great, smart and high speed enlisted and NCO in the Army. But quite frankly, if I have someone working as a CID agent on a sex assault or murder case, I don't want it to be low level NCOs doing the investigating. They need to at least make it like pilots where you have to be a warrant officer to be a CID agent. Require a bachelor's degree. Make the training last a lot longer. Have an age cutoff or years of service minimum, or make it an MOS where you pick the high achievers on the ASVAB and send them off to a year of training.

I spent too many years a military prosecutor or defense attorney lamenting the poor job done by CID agents in the initial investigation stages. And it wasn't because of interference from on high, it was because it was Specialists and Sergeants who were 22, 23, 24, 25 years old, no degree, and not nearly enough training doing the initial crime scene stuff and interviews. Attorneys are always having to step in and do basic investigative work on both sides.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Army to put civilian in c...»Reply #1