9/11 Interpretations

[cantfixstupid]

3. David Ray Griffin

It appears that you're implying that Griffin is not an authority on anything just because of his appearance on Alex Jones' Infowars podcast.

I have listened to and read much of the official version of events by the administration(s) and the mainstream media and I came to much the same conclusions even before I ever heard of David Griffin.

From the sound of your post it seems that you accept the official version of events, namely; that 9/11 was a surprise attack on the US government and its people by Islamic terrorists.

If you do in fact believe that be sure to Google up Neocons and Project for A New American Century (PNAC).

https://www.rrojasdatabank.info/pfpc/PNAC---statement%20of%20principles.pdf
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

Noteworthy excerpts from the second link:
1. Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.
2. In exploiting the “revolution in military affairs,” [RMA] the Pentagon must be driven by the enduring missions for U.S. forces.